Law x Lawbreaker x Lawless

Hello everyone, how do you do? Me? Im still burried in everyone design requests, and because too much requests, I only work seriously if the requester is someone I like, someone important to me, or if i feel I owe him /her. Important here can be describe in two categories, person who I currently relay on, or people that I sure can be use in future, friend? Okay, enough, today I will share my thought about something different, today I will share my psychological evaluation thought about breaking laws

Nowadays, in everyplace we see people cheating or breaking laws, for example, in indonesian, most public school student casually cheating on test or in some country, if u caught speeding or passing through red traffic light, u can always bribe the police to finish the "problem", and it happen in all level of society, young to old, poor to rich, everyone doing it. That why today I will pick " breaking laws" as my main topic. I'll talking about probability ( no, not statistically).

WHO OR WHAT TO BLAME? why do people do that? They have civil study that teach them to obey the country laws and orders, right? People tends to blame the subject, like they dont study civic seriously or they just naturally some rebellious b*stard, or maybe their parent arent cared enough for their behavior. According to my value, there is no "one point mistake" or "one side mistake", because it always be a systematical mistake, I always evaluate a problem by using 3 perspective system. First, from the subject of this problem, it could be person that burns the forest, doctors that attends the patient, or in our today discussion, the law breaker. Second perspective come form the object, the forest tree, the patient, and in this case, the law itself. Third, the outsider perspective, like the society condition, the forest or hospital condition, its like and host -infection agent-and environment relationship in infectious disease case, I use this kinds of thinking system this post onward.

WHY BREAKING LAWS? Hmm why do they? Lets say there are many common theories in society, such as people didn't like the rules, the people are bored with old tradition, they being force to break the rules, the rules itself arent too binding (easy to break),or simply because people didnt even know that the laws they broke is exist, or maybe you can add some more, but for now lets talk about these things, in order u say? I see, lets just begin from "subject's perspektive" and move to "object's and outsider's perspective," and then move to solution part.

• WHY PEOPLE DOESN'T WANT TO FOLLOW OUR ORDER (LAWS) ?Ah I forgot to mention the subject reason, hmmm, many theories, maybe the laws itself its good, but since the humans that suppose to do it are too "smart", they criticized the rules and want to set a new value, I know that actually it correlated with "old rules problems," that I will talk about it latter. Other reason is maybe the rules are a brand new things to the people, we give them new set of rules while them still clinging to their old rules, people, old people especially, its sometimes difficult to adapt to new rules, even though we give them the details of the new rules, they didn't want to know, since they have live peacefully with their old values, its also applied to those who live only with their family or ancestor tradition, even though their surrounding changes as the time flows.

• RULES ARE BORING AND I DIDN'T LIKE IT AT ALL, (or maybe just a bit)  okay, start from here, the font in bold had already stated the subject perspective, so lets think a bit about the reason, well, maybe rules are indeed boring, since many tradition didn't change at all, you know, traditional culture, food, and language are indeed valuable assets to someone places, its differs you from other people from other places, but if we talk about traditional law, most of them are not evolved or change in aaaa, lets say, more than hundred years, okay, lets not say most of them are unfit or fit in present, because some of them are (even though I believe more than half of it unfit to the present), but whether it fit or unfit, the people in that place will change or evolve physically or psychologically, maybe the tradition are fit to apply in general human population, but if its practitioner are changing, it became local chaos (read: local law breaking party), moreover if the traditional laws are indeed unfit to general human population, the law as a "box" will never be able to hold the ever changing human progress and explode, the more "hard and thick" the boxes are,  the greater the explosion (because the boxes own capabilities to hold more "content").Other reason is that we didn't like the law, maybe the law itself give no advantages to the practitioner, its another effect of old laws that created only by one person, or one group, maybe they mean no harm, but its lack of others perspective, not only its doesn't serve all part of society (some people doesn't feel any of its effects), its reduce the sense of I-get-a-part-in-it and sense of belonging. The other possible factor is when the law itself are too easy to manipulate, it happen a lot in organization or country where the law its self is on basic value, and lack of instrumental/applicable definition, so its easy to bend the law and  escape from its consequences, or so they though.

• THE RULES AND PEOPLE ARE GOOD, WHY IT DOESN'T WORK AT ALL?  well, if its not coming from subject and object we have to consider the outer/external factors, in fact, we must consider external factor in all times, in all cases. Maybe the information about the new rules, doesn't reach those whose live in remote places, maybe the new rules are to complicated for the user, it can relate to how well they received education, both formal and informal one, or maybe the authorized person want to make the rules simpler and easier, but only to them, not the user, it does happen a lot. The other reason is the incompetence of the people who suppose to guard the law, since in some under-development country, they became police since they cant be someone else, otherwise their became unemployed, its also related to corrupted government, where laws can be bought for money, other possibility are there is no other way, sometimes people broke law since they cant earn money in any other way, I believe it generally  know as one of the government responsibility, but its also our responsibility, moreover if the government are untrustworthy. Other environmental factor is there exist a place where there is no law applied, lets say, hmm lawless places in blind spots of the people responsible for the application of the law.

 In reality, I think we almost never, well in fact I never see a reason stated above stands alone, it always a combination of some reasons, and so we have to find a multifactorial solution to answer to such problems. I'll try to give mine, its just possible solution, I believe you can found a better one, maybe its too idealist, okay, i think, we better makes "the box" flexible enough, every year, or maybe two or three, we ask people or a group of people that can represent the general population, no, not a government people , actually I prefer a random selection, since I find it hard to trust a politician,  given their current reliability (in my country at least), and we talking about general organization too or maybe smaller group, not only governmental issues, and why we do every two or three years, its to make sure that no laws or traditions are sticking to deep to people thought, so they easier to change and adapt to the new laws, and since it from people we can expect people will have sense of belonging, oh yeah, and make a group of people who have to deliver the new set rules every time we need to change the rules or we can make sure the mass media reach even to the most remote places, one more thing, I believe that if we evaluate the governmental elites every year, and allowed to change the incompetent one, (there is no minimum or maximum years they can rule, its all depend on how long they can be competent enough) they will work more serious and productive, I know maybe some of the "scenario" are left unanswered, and I believe some you can find the better one, so that's all for today, bye...